Different methods to determine maximum heart rate and its influence on internal training load in futsal players
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5016/s1980-6574e10240035Abstract
Aims: The purpose of this study was to compare maximal heart rate (HRmax) determined in official match (OM), Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test level 1 (YYIR-1), and age-predicted equations in futsal players, also assessing the effects of using these HRmax approaches on internal training load (TL) outcomes since HRmax influences the TL internal calculation. Methods: HRmax of professional male futsal players (n=8) was determined in OM, YYIR-1 and by four age-predicted equations: Fox-HRmax; Hossack-HRmax; Tanaka-HRmax; Nikolaidis-HRmax. Additionally, the internal TL of seven training sessions was calculated individually each day for each of the six HRmax approaches using Edwards's method. Statistical analysis comprised ANOVA for repeated measures (p < 0.05) and Cohen's d effect size (ES). Results: Fox-HRmax overestimated all other HRmax-equations and YYIR-1 HRmax, and Nikolaidis-HRmax overestimated Tanaka-HRmax and Hossack-HRmax (p = 0.01; ηP 2 = 0.496). TRIMP statistical results were statistically like HRmax but underestimated (p = 0.008; ηP 2 = 0. 513). Pairwise inferences showed that OM HRmax presented a large effect (d: 0.83) in comparison to the YYIR-1 and a moderate effect (d: -0.35 to 0.35) in comparison to the Fox-HRmax, Tanaka-HRmax and Hossack-HRmax. Nikolaidis-HRmax presented a lower difference with OM, HRmax (d: -0.13, trivial) and TRIMP (d: -0.09, trivial). Conclusion: HRmax from OM presented a higher effect in comparison to the YYIR-1, while the Nikolaidis-HRmax equation was lower and differed from OM HRmax. Futsal coaches are encouraged to use OM to determine HRmax and Nikolaidis-HRmax equation when maximal efforts are not possible, avoiding overestimated TRIMP that may impair training load prescription and physical gains.Downloads
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Motriz. Journal of Physical Education. UNESPAuthors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
a) The authors assign copyright to the magazine, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows the work to be shared with recognition of its authorship and publication in this magazine.
b) The policy adopted by the Editorial Committee is to assign copyright only after a period of 30 months from the date of publication of the article. After this time, authors interested in publishing the same text in another work must send a letter to the Editorial Committee requesting permission to transfer copyright and await a response.
c) This magazine provides public access to all its content, as this allows greater visibility and reach of published articles and reviews. For more information about this approach, visit the Public Knowledge Project, a project that developed this system to improve the academic and public quality of research, distributing OJS as well as other software to support the public access publishing system for academic sources. The names and email addresses on this site will be used exclusively for the purposes of the magazine and will not be available for other purposes. This journal provides open any other party This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License